Once your camera has the line focused, you want to set up two rulers on either side of the line. As you set down the rulers, be very careful not to move anything on the table. The rules should each be touching the line at the same measurement. For example, you would want to set them up each at the 20cm point. Once you have your scene set up, take a picture. More than likely, some of the numbers on a ruler will have a sharper focus than the line. And you need to adjust accordingly. A graph should come up at that point.
Using this graph, you can pull the focus back or span it out depending on how your initial image came out. Once you alter the focus, you should take another picture. Hopefully, the line is now in focus. The video offers the same guide so that you can get the focus you need directly from your camera. When it comes time to use your camera focus chart, you follow the same steps as though you were calibrating your camera with a straight line like in the example above.
You start by putting the chart in front of your camera. It should fill up the entire frame. From there, you can still if your camera lens has a consistently sharp focus across the frame or if it becomes blurry in certain areas. You can also go into the focus settings if the focus is too close or too far away. Ratings and Reviews. App Privacy. Size Compatibility iPhone Requires iOS Mac Requires macOS Languages English, Simplified Chinese.
We are not claiming that our test charts are scientific or as rigorous as a properly designed and printed chart, but what it does is give you a practical idea of how your lens performs at different apertures and focal lengths.
Size-apart, they are identical and both are high resolution at ppi. To start, you need to make a high quality print on a lustre or a bartya gloss-type paper — it is best not to use high gloss materials because reflections and light scatter can make checking the chart a problem.
Printing can be done at home with a photo quality printer or by a commercial online photo printing service. You also need room to work leaving the camera in place — until you do the next focal length. If you prefer, for convenience, just fill the frame with the test chart and shoot it, also following the below procedure. With telephoto lenses you might not have the option of getting back far enough.
Once you have done the centre pictures, reposition the test chart into each corner of frame and if you want to, above, below, right and left. In this case , that's to be expected because we're close enough to the chart that the depth of field is not evenly distributed in front of and behind the focus point: about 3.
The current Wikipedia page on Depth of Field has a good presentation of the concepts. My Online Exif Viewer reports on the depth of field if the image data contains all the requisite data required to compute it.
Some of this data is in the Maker Notes section of metadata, which Photoshop strips, so for best results, check with an original straight-out-of-the-camera image. Here are a few more samples to inspect. As with most images on this post and on my blog, for that matter , clicking through on the image brings you to a larger version.
This was taken with a mm lens from a medium -close distance about three yards , which results in a depth of field evenly split on either side of the focus point. Had it been taken with a short focal length at a close distance, it's possible that the depth of field would start to skew more toward the rear, and as such, a result like this might be expected.
That's not the case here, so this shows back focus. I would expect that the only people who actually read this far are those suffering from really bad autofocus problems, and are desperate to understand them. You have my sympathy, and I hope that my test chart and what I've so verbosely presented here are helpful. Update on my comment Apr 12th. I believe I have an understanding of what is going on.
Much careful manual adjusting of the focus did not change the situation that apparently my 8MP Minolta was autperforming the new Nikon D HOWEVER — I realized the problem might be simple perception; I was comparing the pictures as they were being scaled on my monitors which are also pixelated. Picking a feature that looked sharp on the Minolta and blurry on the D and then adjusting the size of each image ot get the same size pixels on the monitor, I saw that the D at 24MP was about 1.
So an embarassing lesson. As I said before, the initial impression was quite startling. One has to be very careful making these comparisons. On the plus side, I learned a lot about the D It is much harder to use than the Minolta. Thanks for the blog — Stan from California. Hi, this set of focus charts has probably saved me some money. Identified the front focus problem on my Pentax and has given me some clear and consistent results between lenses so I can adjust it when I get access to a PC running PK-Tether software sometime next week.
No sending off my camera to a service company for me then, which is a relief. Hi Jeffrey, Thanks for putting together an excellent chart and explaining everything in detail. So I used your chart the way you stated and found the lens and camera Nikon D were performing just fine with maybe a hint of front focus. This fact is aptly demonstrated by the depth of field scale on the lens of every fine film camera — an idea that seems to have sadly been lost with digital SLRs.
The details are in the specific shooting situation optics, aperture, focus distance. I recently buy a Canon 6D and sigma art lens, as far as i know that suppose to be a sharp and acurate lens but my percentage of missed shots was extreamly high, this site helped me a lot to confirm my suspect for backfocusing issue.
I tested lens on this chart with all focall lenghts and in 5 diferent lenghts, 0. One god point is that sigma has a usb dock to fine tune every focall lenght in 5 points and i hope so that can me managed and resolve by Sigma corp. Thanks for this site, it is extreamly helpfull. I am going to test my Nikon D camera with you exciting chart and different lenses.
As far as concern the intelligent observation about the difference in background vs foreground depth of field, I suppose this should be at least partially compensated by the smaller size of the characters in background. My 2 cents.
Thank very much for a detailed explanation and the chart. I learned a lot. I am going to put my D and lenses through this test. I also suggest to poke a tooth pick through the middle of the focus reference bar to increase sensor detection sureness.
Thank you for providing the testsheet. I have using an NX with kitlens for about one year now and I have trouble with sharpness and autofokus with moving things like fast mountainbikers. I am interested in the comment above regarding zoom lenses and aperture. Specifically because I use manual focus on my prime lenses, but I need auto focus on my zoom, which I use to shoot equestrian competitions in Florida.
Doing so means I need a fixed shutter speed, so my aperture is automatically adjusted and I also use every focal length available to me in my lens. If this technique is not ideal for my situation, I am concerned I will make bad matters worse if I try to make any adjustments to my camera. To make things most precise, test with the biggest aperture smallest f number.
Agora consegui a nitidez que eu queria. Muito obrigada!!! I have done the test and have determined that my D has a bit of front focus going on …for example the 3 in the foreground is sharper than the 3 in the background. Hi, Egill here from Iceland. I have been very frustrated by my D focus issues.
Thank you so much for all the work you put into these instructions. They have helped me a lot. Thanks for the heads up… it looks like Michael renamed the company.. Thank you for this resource.
I own a Pentax K and am seeking to get my lenses tuned Sigma 28mm f1. Combing through the comments section is also very informative. Do you know, or have you encountered anyone who can explain how PK Tether allows this procedure?
0コメント